Las Vegas BikeFest Colors Fight: Clubs Were Assured, Then the Rules Changed Mid-Event
Share
The fight over colors at Las Vegas BikeFest is not really about a vest.
Here is what the record shows. Before the 25th annual BikeFest opened at Craig Ranch Regional Park in North Las Vegas, held Oct. 8 to 11, clubs asked whether there would be a no-colors policy. According to the Motorcycle Riders Foundation, the Southern Nevada Confederation of Clubs was told there would not be one. Midway through the event, club colors and cuts were banned inside the venue anyway. The ban was never lifted. BikeFest's posted policy still says cuts are not permitted inside the venue, while soft colors, meaning club names and logos on shirts, are welcome. And nobody has owned the decision. BikeFest management says the rule came from working closely with the City of North Las Vegas and local law enforcement on event safety and security requirements, and that it does not reflect the event's position toward motorcycle clubs. No statement from the city or any police agency backing that up has surfaced.
The club side, at full strength. A patch is not merch. It is earned, and for a lot of riders it is identity, history, and obligation carried on one piece of leather. Clubs did the right thing here. They asked first, got an answer, planned their travel, and showed up. MRF President Kirk "Hardtail" Willard put it this way: "Clubs did what was asked of them. They got assurances and showed up in good faith." The rider named in the coverage is not a 1%er standoff. He is the International Vice President of Soldiers for Jesus MC, a Christian club, and an MRF board member who had a vendor booth at the event. When a rule can change in the middle of a rally and no one will say who changed it, every club and every vendor planning a season has to ask what an organizer's word is worth.
The event side, at full strength. BikeFest is a free-admission event in a public city park. That is the least controlled gate in the rally world, and the promoter does not set the terms alone. If the city and law enforcement attach safety conditions to holding the event, the choice is to accept them or cancel the rally for everybody, clubs and families alike. The organizers did not bar club members. They barred the cut inside the fence and left the gate open to the same riders in soft colors. A promoter who gets a reputation for fighting the city does not get the park next year, and then nobody rides.
What is not established: who actually ordered the change, and exactly when enforcement started. The MRF says the ban came midway through. One attendee wrote that he was turned away over a patched vest on the first day. Both accounts are out there and they do not line up clean. There are no official turnout numbers, and claims that the ban emptied the park are attendee guesses, not figures. No organized boycott has been documented anywhere in the coverage.
So the argument is this. One side says a word given before the event has to hold, and a rule nobody will own is worse than the rule itself. The other side says a public park event lives and dies by conditions the promoter does not control, and soft colors kept the gate open to everyone.
Where do you land? If an organizer tells your club one thing before the rally and enforces another during it, do you go back next year?
